Decoding the Imperative: Who Needs RoundMap and Why

The imperatives for RoundMap™ are situated at the intersection of three monumental challenges modern businesses face, each with distinct timelines but converging impacts.

  1. The deep-rooted issue of siloization affecting immediate operational efficiency and collaboration.
  2. The ethical and social demands of a younger workforce calling for equitable, transparent, and sustainable practices, reflective of medium-term generational change.
  3. The relentless march of disruptive technologies like AI, blockchain, and quantum computing. These technologies necessitate rapid adaptations, reskilling, and counter-innovations, affecting not just quarterly goals but the very survival and relevance of the organization in the long term.

Failure to adapt to this triad of imperatives risks diminishing a company’s competitive edge, compromising its long-term viability. Let’s look at each of these imperatives in more detail:

Imperative #1: Deeply-rooted Silos

RoundMap is designed for leaders and organizations who recognize the crippling effects of functional silos on performance, innovation, employee engagement, and customer experience.

Contrary to common belief, this isn’t just relevant for large enterprises undergoing transformative change, but its principles apply universally to organizations of any size.


The Pain from Siloization:

RoundMap directly confronts the organizational issue of siloization, a deeply rooted problem that stifles communication, hampers cross-functional collaboration, and perpetuates inefficiencies. While beneficial in some respects, the division of labor and specialization have led to a culture of isolation and disengagement. The most alarming manifestation is the vast percentage of disengaged workers, as highlighted by Gallup studies.

These are some of the adverse effects of siloization on the company’s performance:

  • Operational Inefficiency: Siloed departments can often result in duplication of effort. Teams may unknowingly work on similar projects or issues without the benefit of shared experience or resources, leading to wasted time and effort.
  • Poor Communication: Siloization usually results in an absence of cross-departmental communication, which hampers the flow of information. This lack of open communication can lead to missed opportunities and can also result in departments working at cross-purposes.
  • Hindered Innovation: When teams don’t talk, the potential for innovative ideas to cross-pollinate across the company decreases. Silos can create an environment where the status quo prevails, limiting the organization’s ability to adapt to market changes or evolve its business model.
  • Reduced Employee Morale and Engagement: Employees in siloed organizations often feel disconnected from the larger mission and vision of the company. This lack of shared purpose can lead to reduced morale and lower engagement levels, contributing to higher turnover rates.
  • Erosion of Trust: Lack of collaboration often leads to an erosion of trust among different departments. Teams may start hoarding resources or information, seeing other departments as competitors rather than collaborators, further exacerbating inefficiencies.
  • Neglected Customer Experience: In a siloed organization, the customer’s experience is often disjointed because departments do not share customer data or insights. This lack of a unified approach can result in inconsistent service quality and even lead to customer loss.
  • Limited Accountability and Transparency: Silos can often shield departments from the consequences of their actions, as a lack of cross-departmental oversight can make it easier to pass the blame for mistakes or poor performance onto other teams.
  • Impaired Decision-Making: When data and insights are confined to silos, decision-makers at the executive level do not get a holistic view of the organization. This skewed perspective can lead to strategic errors and missed opportunities.
  • Financial Costs: The operational inefficiencies stemming from siloed working have direct financial implications. These can manifest as increased operational costs, missed revenue opportunities, or investments in initiatives misaligned with the company’s strategic goals.

Pain Confirmations of Siloization:

Numerous studies and academic papers have explored the adverse effects of organizational silos on various aspects of business performance. Here are some:

  1. Harvard Business Review’s “The Silo Lives!”: This paper discusses how silos can lead to inefficiencies and impede innovation. It argues that silos are becoming obsolete and counterproductive in an increasingly interconnected world.

  2. MIT Sloan Review’s “Cross-Silo Leadership”: This article focuses on the importance of cross-silo leadership for innovation and efficiency. It contends that companies can be more innovative and agile when leaders work across organizational boundaries.

  3. Gallup’s State of the American Workplace: Gallup has extensively researched employee engagement and its effects on productivity and turnover. Their findings demonstrate that siloed organizations usually have lower engagement levels, which affects productivity and can lead to higher turnover rates.

  4. Forrester’s Customer Experience Index: Forrester often writes about how the customer experience is affected by internal organizational issues like silos. They argue that a disjointed customer experience often results from departments not sharing data or insights.

  5. Journal of Organizational Change Management: An article titled “The Effects of Organizational Structure on Innovation and Performance” links siloed organizational structures to a lack of innovation and adaptation.

  6. McKinsey’s “Organizational health: A fast track to performance improvement”: This report discusses how siloed operations often lead to poor performance metrics due to a lack of a unified vision and limited accountability.

  7. Stanford Social Innovation Review’s “The Dawn of System Leadership”: This article talks about how silos impede system-wide change and innovation, limiting an organization’s ability to adapt to more significant, systemic challenges.

  8. Deloitte Insights’ “Breaking down business silos”: This report is geared explicitly towards how silos affect digital transformation initiatives, which invariably affect a company’s bottom line due to operational inefficiencies and missed opportunities.

  9. Accenture’s “Outperforming in a Polarized World”: This report discusses how siloed data leads to impaired decision-making at the executive level.

  10. PwC’s “The Global State of Information Security” focuses on the risks of silos in cybersecurity and how poor communication and lack of collaboration between IT and other departments can result in significant financial costs and risks.

These reports and articles contribute to the understanding that silos have widespread adverse effects, affecting everything from operational efficiency to financial performance.

The Gains with RoundMap™:

The gains are multifaceted. On a tactical level, RoundMap facilitates smoother communication and a more efficient workflow by dismantling these functional silos. Strategically, it fosters a culture of inclusivity and EQuitability, valuing each individual’s contribution to the organization. This, in turn, energizes employees, making them proud stakeholders in a joint endeavor, not just cogs in a machine.

But there’s more. By marrying individual potential with organizational objectives, RoundMap doesn’t just improve companies; it elevates the concept of what a company can be—transforming it from a place of work to a community of purpose. In this way, the framework transcends mere utility, serving as a template for how businesses can be both successful and humane, contributing to the bottom line and society.

Gain Confirmations:

These studies collectively support the idea that breaking down silos and fostering an inclusive, equitable culture can lead to tactical and strategic gains, aligning with the principles outlined for RoundMap™:

  1. Human Sigma: This management approach combines strengths-based employee engagement and customer engagement to increase human economic value. The study underscores the significant financial gains from increasing employee engagement, which aligns with transforming a company into a “community of purpose.” The results imply that breaking down silos to improve engagement could lead to multiple gains.
  2. Heidi Gardner’s Work on Smart Collaboration: Gardner’s work centers around the idea that firms collaborating across silos of expertise (such as cross-practice or cross-geography) deliver more value to clients and are more financially successful. Her work demonstrates that breaking down silos leads to innovation and better problem-solving. This aligns closely with our point on smoother communication and efficient workflow and supports the notion that doing so would improve companies on both a tactical and strategic level.
  3. Gallup’s State of the American Workplace: This report aligns with our concept of EQuitability and inclusivity, as it shows that higher employee engagement leads to a plethora of benefits, ranging from higher productivity to lower turnover, making employees feel like stakeholders rather than just “cogs in a machine.”
  4. Deloitte’s Global Human Capital Trends: These reports often discuss the positive impact of a highly networked, inclusive, and open culture within organizations, contributing to the bottom line and the more significant societal role a company can play.
  5. Forrester’s Customer Experience Reports: These show that customer experience is often improved when there is less internal friction—something achievable by breaking down silos. Better customer experience directly correlates with improved financial performance.
  6. MIT Sloan’s Studies on Learning Organizations: These studies affirm that companies that foster a culture of continuous learning and adaptability perform better in the long term. Our notion of “marrying individual potential with organizational objectives” closely aligns with the principles of a learning organization.
  7. Harvard Business Review’s “Creating Shared Value”: This article by Michael Porter and Mark Kramer discusses how companies can create economic value in a way that creates value for society, closely resonating with our point about companies contributing to the bottom line and society.
  8. McKinsey’s “The Link Between Meaning and Organizational Health”: This report demonstrates that companies where employees find their work meaningful are more profitable and have higher employee satisfaction rates, echoing our point about transforming companies into ‘communities of purpose.’

Imperative #2: The War on Talent

The rising influence of a younger generation in the workforce—often broadly referred to as Millennials and Gen Z—has ushered in a new set of values and expectations, rapidly reshaping the corporate culture and strategy landscape. This demographic is not just looking for a paycheck; they are actively seeking workplaces that align with their values, primarily equitability, transparency, and sustainability.

war for talent

The Pains from The War on Talent:

  • Talent as a Strategic Asset: Talent has never been more critical, and we are in an era where the “war for talent” is not just a buzzword but a strategic imperative. Younger professionals are acutely aware of their value and are willing to leverage it to work for companies that meet their ethical and social criteria. Companies that fail to adapt to these evolving norms risk stagnation and an existential threat as they lose out on top-tier talent essential for innovation and competitive advantage.
  • Ethical and Social Responsibility as Non-Negotiables: Equitability, transparency, and sustainability are no longer optional or mere marketing talking points; they are non-negotiables that directly affect a company’s ability to attract and retain talent. Young professionals are increasingly willing to forgo higher salaries and traditional perks in favor of companies that offer a strong sense of purpose and positive social impact.
  • The Business Case for Change: This shift isn’t just a matter of social justice or ethical responsibility; it’s a business imperative. Companies that successfully adapt to these demands will find themselves with a more engaged, motivated, and productive workforce. In turn, they’ll gain a competitive edge in marketplaces increasingly driven by innovation and rapid adaptation to change.
  • A Reflection on Brand and Reputation: Beyond the immediate talent pool, these issues also profoundly affect a company’s brand and reputation. A failure to meet these ethical standards can result in public relations crises that can be devastating in the age of social media, where consumer sentiment can shift rapidly and have a long-lasting impact.

Pain Confirmations:

  1. Edelman Trust Barometer: This annual global study often highlights the role of trust in attracting and retaining talent. Organizations with low transparency often score low in trust, affecting their ability to win the talent war.
  2. Glassdoor Reports: Their annual studies often show that transparency around processes, particularly in relation to pay and benefits, is a critical factor in attracting talent.
  3. McKinsey’s ‘Diversity Matters’ Report demonstrates that companies in the top quartile for gender or racial and ethnic diversity are more likely to have financial returns above their national industry medians.
  4. Deloitte’s Global Human Capital Trends Reports often highlight that an organization’s commitment to diversity and inclusion is a significant factor in attracting and retaining talent.
  5. Global Talent Trends Report by Mercer: This report often highlights that today’s talent is increasingly looking at whether organizations are committed to sustainability and ethical practices.
  6. Cone Communications Millennial Employee Engagement Study: This report found that millennials are more likely to accept a job from a company that practices sustainable and ethical operations.
  7. Korn Ferry’s “Future of Work” Survey: Highlights that talent is increasingly looking for companies that have a broader positive impact on society.

The Gains with RoundMap™:

The principles of RoundMap align closely with these demands. Its focus on ending siloization speaks to the yearning for a more equitable and collaborative work environment. Its emphasis on a holistic approach to business addresses the call for transparency and sustainability. By providing a framework that explicitly tackles these issues, RoundMap is not just solving immediate operational problems; it’s laying the groundwork for the sustainable, equitable, and transparent business environments that the next generation of talent demands.

Companies that aspire to be future-ready cannot afford to ignore these seismic shifts in workforce expectations. Adapting to them is not a matter of choice but of survival. RoundMap, in this context, serves as both a guide and a tool for this crucial adaptation.

Gain Confirmations:

Studies supporting the imperative of EQuitability in business practices:

  • McKinsey & Company: McKinsey & Company has extensively researched the link between talent and corporate performance. According to their studies, companies that prioritize talent management exhibit higher rates of financial success and are better able to adapt to market changes. They emphasize attracting high-quality talent as a crucial factor in maintaining a competitive edge.
  • Deloitte Insights: Deloitte’s Global Human Capital Trends report consistently highlights talent acquisition and retention as core elements of organizational success. Their studies suggest that companies focusing on “the employee experience” see improvements in productivity, customer satisfaction, and even profitability.
  • SHRM (Society for Human Resource Management): SHRM reports that the cost of poor talent management can be staggering. Their research suggests that the direct cost of replacing an employee can range from 50% to 60% of an employee’s annual salary, with total costs associated with turnover ranging from 90% to 200%.
  • Gallup Research: Gallup has shown that high employee engagement correlates with various performance outcomes, including profitability, productivity, and customer engagement. Conversely, low engagement and high turnover can seriously impact these areas negatively.
  • Harvard Business Review: HBR articles have examined how the failure to retain top talent can result in lost institutional knowledge, reduced morale among remaining employees, and the tangible costs of hiring and training replacements. These factors have long-term ramifications on a company’s strategic execution and financial performance.
  • Boston Consulting Group: BCG’s studies strongly correlate between effective people management practices and profit margins. Their research also underlines the increasingly competitive nature of the talent market, emphasizing that failing to attract and retain talent can significantly hamper a company’s growth prospects.
  • Talent-Linked Metrics: Furthermore, metrics like Employee Lifetime Value (ELTV) and Employee Net Promoter Score (eNPS) are increasingly being used to quantify the impact of talent management on organizational success. Companies that score high on these metrics often achieve their strategic objectives more successfully.

Imperative #3: Technological Landslides

The third imperative for RoundMap™ addresses the urgency of adapting to rapid technological shifts within the framework of the long-wave business cycle. As disruptive technologies like AI, blockchain, and quantum computing become increasingly integral to business operations, the cost of inaction or sluggish adaptation spirals upward. RoundMap™ serves as a strategic compass, guiding organizations in fostering a culture capable of agile responses to technological advancements, thereby securing their long-term resilience and competitiveness.


The Pains from Technological Landslides:

In the long-wave business cycle, disruptive technologies are not merely innovation buzzwords but paradigm-shifting forces that demand immediate attention:

  • AI: Artificial intelligence affects everything from customer service to supply chain management. With machine learning and data analytics, AI enables organizations to make more informed decisions, optimize operations, and improve customer experiences.
  • Blockchain: Beyond cryptocurrencies, blockchain has found applications in supply chain transparency, contract automation, and digital identity verification, offering unprecedented levels of security and trust.
  • Quantum Computing: Though still in its infancy, quantum computing promises to revolutionize industries like cryptography, materials science, and data analysis, solving problems that are currently computationally infeasible.
  • Internet of Things (IoT): The ability to connect devices and systems transforms industries from manufacturing to healthcare, offering unprecedented control, monitoring, and automation capabilities.
  • 5G Networks: The rollout of 5G is expected to drastically increase data speed and connectivity, enabling real-time analytics and facilitating other technologies like IoT and edge computing.
  • Edge Computing: As opposed to cloud computing, edge computing brings data processing closer to the location where it’s needed, improving speed and efficiency, which is particularly important in real-time processing scenarios like autonomous vehicles.
  • Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR): These technologies are not only redefining gaming but are also making inroads into healthcare, real estate, and training simulations, offering immersive experiences that were previously unimaginable.
  • Cybersecurity Evolution: As technology evolves, so do security threats. Innovations in cybersecurity, like zero-trust architecture and AI-driven threat detection, are becoming mandatory as the risk landscape grows more complex.
  • Biotechnology: CRISPR, gene therapy, and other biotechnological advances are revolutionizing medicine, agriculture, and data storage.
  • Renewable Energy Technologies: Advances in solar, wind, and battery technologies are disrupting the energy sector, making renewable options more viable and accessible.
  • Robotic Process Automation (RPA): Automating routine tasks increases efficiency in sectors from finance to healthcare, but it also poses questions about workforce adaptation and skills development.
  • Big Data and Analytics: The ability to process and analyze vast amounts of data in real-time provides businesses insights that profoundly influence decision-making processes.
  • Natural Language Processing (NLP): Advances here make machine-human interaction increasingly seamless, affecting everything from customer service chatbots to advanced data retrieval methods.
  • E-commerce Innovations: Drones for delivery, virtual trial rooms, and hyper-personalized user experiences are just a few ways technology reshapes retail.

Companies lagging in technological adoption risk obsolescence, reduced competitive advantage, and a diminished ability to attract talent skilled in these areas. 

Failure to adapt leads to a widening gap between the organization and its more agile competitors, resulting in lost market share, a tarnished brand, and compromised strategic goals.

Pain Confirmations of Lagging in Tech:

The following reports collectively confirm that staying ahead or even just keeping pace in the rapidly evolving technological landscape is beneficial and essential for maintaining a healthy bottom line:

  1. MIT Sloan and Capgemini Consulting Study: This study found that digitally mature companies were 26% more profitable than their industry peers, who were less advanced in their digital transformations.

  2. McKinsey Digital Quotient: McKinsey’s work on the Digital Quotient (DQ) measures how thriving companies adapt to digital trends. It has found that high-DQ companies show significant revenue growth and profitability advantages over low-DQ companies.

  3. Gartner’s Hype Cycles and Magic Quadrants: These reports often provide insights into how technological readiness impacts business outcomes. Organizations considered “Leaders” in adopting technology tend to outperform those that lag.

  4. Deloitte’s Digital Disruption Index: The report found that companies not investing enough in digital technologies risk lower revenue growth and reduced profitability compared to digitally mature ones.

  5. PwC’s Digital IQ Survey: Their findings suggest that companies with a more advanced Digital IQ consistently outperform their market in revenue growth, profitability, and innovation.

  6. Forrester’s Digital Business Readiness: This report shows that companies that are more prepared for digital business models tend to experience better customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction, and financial performance.

  7. Accenture’s “Reworking the Revolution”: According to this report, companies that invest in AI and human-machine collaboration at the same rate as top-performing businesses could boost revenues by an average of 38 percent by 2022 and raise employment levels by 10 percent.

  8. Boston Consulting Group’s “The Most Innovative Companies” Report correlates the ability to innovate (which often involves technological adoption) with a company’s financial performance, showing that innovative companies tend to perform better in terms of market share and profitability.

  9. IBM’s “The Value of Being First to Market”: Although slightly older, this report discusses the advantages of being a first-mover in technology adoption, citing higher market shares and profitability for early adopters.

  10. IDC Studies: Various reports from the International Data Corporation (IDC) have shown that companies lagging in technology adoption tend to fall behind in productivity, efficiency, and profitability.

The Gains with RoundMap™:

RoundMap™ equips organizations to better respond to these rapid technological shifts by fostering a culture of continuous learning, cross-functional collaboration, and systemic adaptability. By breaking down silos, RoundMap enhances the flow of information and ideas across the organization, allowing for quicker identification of technological trends and needs. It facilitates the rapid redeployment of skills and resources, enabling a more agile response to technological opportunities or threats. In essence, RoundMap transforms technological challenges into avenues for innovation and growth, fortifying the organization’s long-term resilience and competitiveness.

By incorporating these technological shifts as a core imperative, RoundMap™ ensures that your organization is not merely keeping pace with the present but is strategically poised for the future. It aligns your team’s talents and adaptability with the demands of a continually evolving technological landscape, turning potential pain points into propellants for sustainable growth.

Gain Confirmations from RoundMap:

The principles upon which RoundMap™ is built are consistently supported by studies as critical factors enabling organizations to adapt and thrive in a rapidly changing technological landscape:

  • Harvard Business Review’s “The Age of Continuous Connection”: This article describes how continuous learning and adaptation are critical for organizations to survive in the digital age.

  • MIT Sloan’s “The New Logic of Competition”: This study found that companies that focused on capabilities such as adaptability, agility, and inter-organizational collaboration had a competitive edge.

  • Forrester’s Reports on Customer Experience: Many reports suggest that breaking down silos and enhancing the flow of information can significantly improve customer experience, directly correlating with financial performance.

  • Deloitte’s Global Human Capital Trends Reports often discuss the necessity of cross-functional collaboration and systemic adaptability in organizations, emphasizing that companies excelling in these areas tend to outperform their competitors.

  • Gartner’s Studies on Digital Dexterity: Gartner has emphasized that an organization’s ability to adapt quickly to technological changes is crucial for long-term success.

  • McKinsey’s “The Five Trademarks of Agile Organizations”: This report describes how an agile organization structure that facilitates the flow of information and rapid decision-making can significantly affect a company’s ability to adapt to market changes.

  • Boston Consulting Group’s “Innovation in the Digital Age”: BCG has found that companies that invest in their ability to innovate (which includes rapid response to technological opportunities) tend to be more financially successful.

  • Accenture’s “Technology Vision” Reports often highlight the growing importance of adaptability and the need for continuous innovation in response to technological changes, linking these capabilities to better financial performance.

  • IBM’s Enterprise Agility Studies: These studies confirm that enterprise agility, which includes rapid redeployment of skills and resources, is a significant factor in organizational success.

  • PwC’s Adapt to Survive: This report links the ability of an organization to adapt its skills and operations quickly to its long-term profitability and survival.

Additional Imperatives

Considering the multifaceted challenges businesses face today, more imperatives could be critical:

  1. Globalization and Cultural Intelligence:

    • Pain: In an increasingly interconnected world, businesses must adapt to global markets, diverse customer bases, and varied cultural norms. Failing to do so risks losing opportunities and alienating potential customers and partners.

    • Gain: By promoting cross-functional and cross-border collaboration, RoundMap™ assists organizations in understanding diverse market needs and cultural sensitivities, thereby facilitating effective global strategies.

  2. Data-Driven Decision Making:

    • Pain: The ability to capture, analyze, and derive insights from data has become a cornerstone of modern business. Organizations that lag in these capabilities are less informed, less agile, and, ultimately, less competitive.

    • Gain: RoundMap™ encourages the breakdown of silos that often isolate valuable data, allowing for a more holistic approach to data analysis and decision-making across departments.

  3. Customer-Centricity:

    • Pain: Traditional business models often focus on products or services, but the companies that excel today put the customer at the center of all they do. Understanding the customer journey and tailoring experiences has become imperative for survival and growth.

    • Gain: The framework helps align internal functions to external customer touchpoints, ensuring the entire organization is oriented toward customer needs and experiences.

  4. Environmental Sustainability:

    • Pain: The growing awareness and concern about climate change, resource depletion, and waste management have made sustainability a critical business imperative. This aspect is crucial for attracting a conscientious workforce and customer base.

    • Gain: RoundMap™ supports an organization’s efforts to integrate sustainable practices by facilitating cross-departmental collaboration on sustainability initiatives.

  5. Cybersecurity and Data Privacy: 

    • Pain: With cyber threats evolving daily and data privacy laws becoming increasingly stringent, securing data and privacy is critical. A single breach can compromise customer trust irreversibly.

    • Gain: By encouraging better communication and resource sharing among IT, legal, and operations departments, RoundMap™ helps build a more cohesive cybersecurity strategy.

  6. Innovation and Agility: 

    • Pain: Beyond technology, innovation in business models, partnerships, supply chains, and employee engagement can set a company apart from competitors. The pace of change is not slowing; thus, agility and a culture of innovation are imperative.

    • Gain: RoundMap™ fosters a culture of open dialogue and collaboration, allowing organizations to respond more rapidly to market changes and innovate effectively.

  7. Emotional and Psychological Safety: 

    • Pain: Creating a work environment where employees feel safe to express their thoughts, ideas, and concerns without fearing negative repercussions is critical for engagement and retention.

    • Gain: The framework emphasizes inclusivity and equitable practices, creating an environment where employees feel valued and safe to express themselves.

  8. Regulatory Compliance and Ethics: 

    • Pain: With increasing rules, regulations, and ethical standards to adhere to, the imperative for rigorous compliance mechanisms has never been greater.

    • Gain: RoundMap™ facilitates better coordination among compliance, legal, and operational departments, enabling a more unified and effective approach to meeting regulatory demands.

Are You Ready to Co-Create Lasting Impact?

Let's Shape the Future Together