Product-Market Fit: But What About the Company?

Product-Market Fit: But What About the Company?

There has been a lot of talk about achieving product-market fit ever since the concept was introduced by Marc Andreessen in 2007. But what about the company that delivers the product? Can the company obtain a big enough market to achieve profitability, and can it actually satisfy that market?

Product-market fit describes a scenario in which a company’s target customers are buying, using, and telling others about the company’s product in numbers large enough to sustain that product’s growth and profitability. It’s a scenario in which a product satisfies customer needs so that alternative products do not.

pyramid 30011
Product-Market Fit Pyramid by Dan Olsen

Marc Andreessen believes companies who have achieved this ideal state can sense it because ‘money is piling up, and investment bankers are staking out the company’. On the other hand, companies who haven’t achieved Product-Market Fit can sense it, too, because word of mouth isn’t spreading, deals aren’t closing, and press reviews are flat.

What About Company Fitness?

You may have found the ideal product and an underserved market segment, but does the supplier’s organization fit the product? And can the supplier’s organization deliver on its promise to a certain market? When is an opportunity fit for the company?

Whether a product-market fit is good for the company, in my opinion, deserves quite a bit more attention than it usually gets. Andreessen addressed the issue by distinguishing between two key stages: before product-market fit (BPMF) and after product-market fit (APMF). 

Before you develop a product that enough people are willing to pay for, your team cannot afford to focus on other important strategic objectives such as growth or upselling existing users. Those initiatives could even be counterproductive.

So, consider your options carefully before you decide to upscale the business. Do you want to add the product to your existing portfolio or create a separate business unit? Can you benefit from shared or untapped business resources or are you overstretching or overcommitting them? Or do you want to spin out a whole new business venture? Or even license the idea to a third party and obtain a kickback?

The next image is a first attempt to describe some of the issues related to determining the probability of what I would like to call a Perfect Fit.

Business Lessons: To LED or Not?

During one of my interim assignments, a company employee told me he needed to attend a course to learn about LED technology and how to design a lighting plan for buildings. I was puzzled because my client’s core business was selling software licenses, and to my knowledge, nobody had any relevant knowledge of LED technology or knew how to engage with building designers. 

So I asked the CEO why he had selected this ‘exotic’ product line. He found it an opportunity because he could buy LED lighting and fixtures cheaply, allowing the business to make a solid profit. But without any expertise or relevant capabilities, I asked, wasn’t he concerned with the huge capabilities gap? After all, this was a complete diversification from the core business.

“Yes,” he replied, “that’s why I’ve sent them on a course.”

The next day, I noticed that people were in shock. They realized that they knew nothing about the product, the technology, or the market and had no idea what was expected of them, let alone consider their competencies to fit the new functional requirements. Luckily, I managed to talk the CEO out of it.

Years later, the CEO decided to introduce the LED business after all. However, they could not make the product line profitable. More importantly, by requiring frontline employees to sell and support a wide range of products and services, none of the product lines matured, and the business went bankrupt.

This story highlights the importance of aligning your business strategy with your core competencies. While diversification can be tempting, it’s essential to ensure that you have the necessary skills and resources to support it. Otherwise, you risk spreading yourself too thin and losing sight of your core business. You can create a sustainable and profitable business model by focusing on your strengths and building on them.

Author

  • Edwin Korver

    Edwin Korver is a polymath celebrated for his mastery of systems thinking and integral philosophy, particularly in intricate business transformations. His company, CROSS-SILO, embodies his unwavering belief in the interdependence of stakeholders and the pivotal role of value creation in fostering growth, complemented by the power of storytelling to convey that value. Edwin pioneered the RoundMap®, an all-encompassing business framework. He envisions a future where business harmonizes profit with compassion, common sense, and EQuitability, a vision he explores further in his forthcoming book, "Leading from the Whole."

Share the Post:

Recent Articles

Management Innovation: The Imperative for a Unified Approach to Systemic Change

Circuitry of Innovation: Bridging Organizational Silos for Collaborative Success

Embracing the Unknown: The Courage to Leap Towards a Future of Our Own Making

Adapting to Uncertainty: Embracing Agility in Building Future-Fit Organizations

50+ Quotes on Business Wisdom: from Leadership to Strategic Risk-Taking

The Data Access Paradox: Democratizing Information While Ensuring Security

The Change Paradox: Navigating Resilience and Vulnerability in Uncertain Times

The Digitization Paradox: The Balancing Act in the Age of Automation

The Leadership Paradox: Balancing Centralized Authority with Decentralized Empowerment

The Ethical Paradox: Balancing Profitable Humonity and Progressive Humanity

The Specialization Paradox: Balancing Reductionism and Integralism

The Strategy Paradox: Balancing Efficiency in Management with Visionary Leadership

The Interaction Paradox: Balancing Transactional and Relational Dynamics

The Innovation Paradox: Balancing Steady Refinement and Acute Novelty

The Productivity Paradox: How Optimization Unwittingly Stifles Innovation

Join Our Newsletter