In a world increasingly aware of its challenges, the line between genuine commitment to a cause and the relentless pursuit of profit has never been more apparent. While some individuals and organizations dedicate themselves to creating meaningful impact, others disguise their cash-driven motives under a cloak of purpose. They frequently and openly talk the walk but never walk the talk.
Those prioritize profit over people and measure success in dollars rather than difference. They craft narratives of change without embodying the passion or responsibility that genuine change demands. Cold, calculated, and unpassionate, they are the wolves in the business landscape, preying on the hopes and efforts of others for personal gain.
As leaders and consumers, we have a crucial role in challenging profit-driven motives. We must discern the genuine from the feigned, champion those who prioritize impact, and challenge the hollow promises of those who only care about the cash. Our actions can make a significant difference.
The question is: Are you truly committed to making a difference, or are you just in it for the dollars?
How to Tell the Wolves from the Shepherds?
In leadership and business, some genuinely care for their flock—the Shepherds—and some are in disguise, preying on opportunities for personal gain—the Wolves. Distinguishing between them is crucial for aligning with true purpose and impact. Here’s how to tell the Wolves from the Shepherds:
1. Check Their Actions, Not Just Their Words
- Red Flag: They talk extensively about values, sustainability, or social impact but lack concrete actions or measurable outcomes.
- What to Look For: Genuine changemakers have a track record of initiatives, transparent impact reports, and tangible results aligning with their mission.
2. Examine Where They Invest Their Resources
- Red Flag: Much of their budget is spent on marketing their “purpose” rather than investing in real change.
- What to Look For: Authentic organizations allocate resources—time, money, and people—to initiatives that drive impact, not just publicity stunts.
3. Observe Their Leadership and Culture
- Red Flag: Leadership focuses solely on financial metrics, such as revenue growth and profit margins, with little mention of stakeholder impact or ethical considerations.
- What to Look For: Leaders who value purpose over profit will prioritize stakeholder engagement, employee well-being, and ethical practices alongside financial performance.
4. Assess Their Consistency and Commitment
- Red Flag: They jump on trending causes for publicity or abandon causes when they no longer serve their financial interests.
- What to Look For: Consistency in supporting specific causes over time indicates a deeper commitment, even when it’s not the most profitable path.
5. Look for Genuine Collaboration and Transparency
- Red Flag: They operate in silos, hoard information, or manipulate data to appear more impactful than they are.
- What to Look For: True purpose-driven entities collaborate openly, share knowledge, and embrace transparency, even when it exposes challenges or setbacks.
6. Watch How They Handle Criticism and Accountability
- Red Flag: They deflect criticism, lack accountability, or are defensive when questioned about their practices.
- What to Look For: Authentic organizations welcome feedback, acknowledge shortcomings, and actively work to improve based on stakeholder input.
7. Evaluate Their Impact Claims
- Red Flag: Impact claims are vague, exaggerated, or not backed by evidence; they use buzzwords without substance.
- What to Look For: Look for clear, specific, measurable impact statements backed by data and independent verification when possible.
8: Analyze Their Relationship with Short-Term Gains
- Red Flag: Their decisions prioritize short-term financial gains over long-term sustainability and impact.
- What to Look For: Organizations genuinely driven by a cause make decisions with long-term impact in mind, often sacrificing immediate profits for more significant, sustainable outcomes.
By scrutinizing these aspects, you can better identify those who genuinely care about making a difference versus those who are merely in it for the money. Remember, actions speak louder than words, and true commitment to a cause is reflected in consistent, purpose-driven behavior across all levels of an organization.
Lessons to Learn
Let’s examine three recent cases: Adam Neuman of WeWork, Sam Bankman-Fried of FTX, and Donald Trump. These leaders portrayed themselves as Shepherds guiding their endeavors toward noble missions, yet their actions ultimately revealed them as wolves in sheep’s clothing.
The Case of Adam Neumann, WeWork:
The Proclaimed Mission: Adam Neumann positioned WeWork as more than a co-working space company. He framed it as a mission-driven organization aiming to “elevate the world’s consciousness.” He frequently spoke about building a community that would positively impact the world, emphasizing wellness, sustainability, and creating a better work-life balance for employees.
Actions That Contradicted the Mission:
- Questionable Business Practices: Neumann’s leadership was marked by erratic spending, self-dealing, and a focus on personal enrichment. He leased buildings he owned back to WeWork, benefiting directly from company funds.
- Lavish Lifestyle: While positioning WeWork as a company committed to communal values, Neumann was known for a luxurious lifestyle, including private jets and extravagant parties, which contrasted starkly with the communal and sustainable ethos he preached.
- Poor Governance: Neumann’s leadership was often criticized for a lack of accountability and governance. He maintained outsized control over the company’s decisions through a complex voting structure, which many saw as prioritizing his power over the company’s well-being.
- Misleading the Public: Leading up to WeWork’s attempted IPO, financial disclosures revealed unsustainable business practices and massive losses, shattering the company’s image as mission-driven. Investors quickly saw through the proclaimed mission as a facade for a heavily indebted real estate leasing company.
- Fall from Grace: Ultimately, Neumann was ousted from WeWork as the company’s valuation plummeted, and the IPO was pulled. His departure came with a nearly $1.7 billion exit package, highlighting the stark contrast between his personal gain and the company’s struggles.
Why He’s Seen as a Wolf: Neumann’s case is often cited as a classic example of “purpose-washing”—using grand, mission-driven rhetoric to mask the primary pursuit of profit and personal gain. The narrative of elevating the world’s consciousness was seen as a veneer for a leader whose actions ultimately prioritized wealth and power over genuine impact.
The Case of Sam Bankman-Fried, FTX:
The Proclaimed Mission: Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of FTX, promoted himself as a champion of effective altruism—a philosophy that focuses on using resources to do the most good. He was vocal about his commitment to donate billions of dollars to charitable causes, positioning FTX as a company with a mission to make a positive global impact. His image as a “crypto savior” who aimed to use his wealth for good resonated with many, helping him garner trust and admiration.
Actions That Contradicted the Mission:
- Financial Mismanagement and Fraud: In stark contrast to his proclaimed altruistic motives, it was revealed that FTX was deeply involved in financial mismanagement. Funds from FTX customers were misappropriated and used to cover losses at his hedge fund, Alameda Research, and to fund lavish personal expenses.
- Lack of Transparency and Governance: FTX’s operations were marked by poor oversight, poor governance, and opaque financial practices. Despite promoting transparency and ethics, the company’s internal controls were almost non-existent, allowing unchecked risky behavior and eventual collapse.
- Deceptive Public Persona: While Bankman-Fried presented himself as a humble, ethical leader driven by a desire to do good, behind the scenes, the company was engaging in deceptive practices, including misleading investors, regulators, and the public about FTX’s financial health.
- Collapse and Aftermath: FTX’s dramatic collapse in late 2022 led to billions in customer losses and a crisis of confidence in the cryptocurrency industry. Bankman-Fried was charged with multiple counts of fraud and conspiracy and faces significant legal repercussions for his actions.
Why He’s Seen as a Wolf: Sam Bankman-Fried’s rise and fall are powerful examples of how a leader can exploit the facade of purpose-driven leadership while pursuing self-interest. His public narrative of being a principled, altruistic leader was contradicted by actions prioritizing personal and financial gain, leading to one of the most significant financial scandals in recent history.
The Case of Donald Trump
The Proclaimed Mission: Donald Trump positioned himself as a champion of the “forgotten” American, promising to drain the swamp, bring back jobs, and restore power to the people. His campaign and presidency were filled with rhetoric about fighting corruption, standing up for the everyday citizen, and making America great again. He often framed himself as an outsider willing to challenge the status quo and take on the establishment for the nation’s good.
Actions That Contradicted the Mission:
- Self-Interest and Conflicts of Interest: Despite promises to prioritize the country, Trump’s tenure was marked by numerous conflicts of interest, including leveraging his presidency to promote his businesses. He frequently visited his properties at taxpayers’ expense, and his family business profited from foreign and domestic clients seeking favor with his administration.
- Erosion of Trust and Accountability: Trump’s leadership was characterized by disregarding norms and institutions, undermining trust in democratic processes and the rule of law. He often attacked the media, judiciary, and intelligence agencies when they did not align with his narrative, eroding public trust in these critical institutions.
- Incitement and Division: Instead of uniting the country, Trump often employed divisive rhetoric, attacking opponents, minorities, and critics. His approach to leadership was more about consolidating power and loyalty than fostering a sense of unity and collective progress.
- Misleading Claims and Falsehoods: Throughout his presidency and campaigns, Trump made numerous false claims and spread misinformation. This included exaggerating his achievements, making unsubstantiated claims of election fraud, and spreading misinformation about critical issues such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Lack of Transparency: Trump was the first president in decades to refuse to release his tax returns, breaking a tradition of transparency. Investigations later revealed extensive financial entanglements, questionable business practices, and potential legal violations contradicting his image as a successful, self-made billionaire working solely for the public good.
- Focus on Personal Loyalty Over Competence: Trump’s appointments and dismissals were often based more on personal loyalty than on qualifications or expertise, which led to a chaotic administration and undermined the effectiveness of governance.
Why He’s Seen as a Wolf: Trump’s actions consistently pointed to a leader more interested in personal power, wealth, and loyalty than the nation’s well-being or adherence to democratic principles. His use of populist rhetoric masked an agenda that often prioritized self-interest and a narrow base of supporters over broader national interests.
Red Flags:
- Consistent disregard for norms and ethical guidelines.
- Persistent spreading of misinformation and baseless claims.
- Exploitation of public office for personal gain.
- Divisive tactics and undermining of democratic institutions.
- Focus on personal loyalty over the national good.
Societal Implications: Despite these red flags, Trump continues to be celebrated by a significant portion of the population as a hero and an anti-establishment figure. This glorification reflects a broader societal issue: a willingness to overlook harmful behavior if it aligns with personal or political beliefs. It underscores the need to shift the narrative toward valuing leaders who genuinely serve the common good.
Conclusion
The Neuman, Bankman-Fried, and Trump cases are stark reminders that leaders who loudly proclaim to be on a mission to do good can sometimes be wolves in disguise. It highlights the importance of looking beyond the surface, scrutinizing leaders’ actions, and holding them accountable to their proclaimed values.
These examples underscore the necessity for vigilance and skepticism in distinguishing between genuine Shepherds who care for their flock and Wolves who prey under the guise of purpose.
A Final Thought
Despite the harm caused by these wolves in sheep’s clothes, our society often celebrates them as heroes rather than holding them accountable. Instead of being vilified, they are glorified—reflecting a deep-rooted belief that greed is good and that success is defined by taking whatever you can, whenever you can before someone else does. This mindset has lulled us into turning a blind eye to those who prey on others for personal gain. To shift this narrative, we must start sharing different stories—stories that elevate those who genuinely help others thrive and build better, more sustainable societies. Only then can we begin to recognize and celebrate the true heroes among us, those who lead with integrity and a commitment to the greater good.
Continue Reading:
More Than Crumbs: The Case for True Value Creation
For decades, shareholder primacy has dictated corporate decision-making, driving businesses to prioritize short-term profits and disproportionate returns to shareholders over long-term sustainability and stakeholder value.
Beyond Extraction: Why Regenerative Business is the Only Way Forward
The RoundMap’s Regenerative Business Framework proposes a dual-cycle approach to business: one focused on value creation and another on impact. However, reality presents us with
RoundMap Regenerative Business Framework: Empowering the Present while Building the Future
Executive Summary The Regenerative Business Framework addresses the critical need for businesses to move beyond mere profitability toward regenerative practices that drive long-term growth and
The RoundMap Flywheel: A Shift Toward Sustainable Ecosystem Resilience
What if impact creation was as strategic and intentional as value creation? What if every dollar earned didn’t just fuel a business’s bottom line but
From Striving to Thriving: How Amazon is a Strive-Driven Giant Failing to Thrive
Amazon has become synonymous with business success, often hailed as a master of efficiency, customer obsession, and innovation. At the heart of its growth strategy
Impact Strategies to Amplify Value and Mitigate Harm Across Stakeholders
What if doing the right thing wasn’t just a moral choice but a strategic one? What if amplifying your organization’s positive impact while mitigating harm
From Extraction to Contribution: Thriving Together with Shared Success
The Flywheel of Shared Success is designed to demonstrate that staying within the boundaries of responsible growth doesn’t mean limiting our ambitions—it means channeling them
The Twin Engines of Progress: Returns on Value and Impact
At the heart of the Flywheel of Shared Success lies the powerful interplay between Value Returns and Impact Returns, both of which operate on the
From Hopping for Cash to Building Bridges: Why Self-Interest Alone Can’t Sustain Shared Prosperity
What we’re proposing with the Flywheel of Shared Success is nothing short of a call to confront and correct our deeply flawed execution of Adam
The Strive & Thrive Cycle: Distinquishing Between Value and Impact
Distinguishing between value creation and deployment (Strive-phase) and impact creation and deployment (Thrive-phase) is critical to clarifying their roles within the Strive & Thrive Cycle. Here’s
From Striving to Thriving: How Decathlon is Shaping a Sustainable Future in Sports Retail
In the ever-evolving world of sports retail, the line between short-term success and long-term impact is a delicate balancing act. For companies like Decathlon, the
From Profit to Purpose: How Shared Value Networks Unlock Long-Term Impact
Businesses today face a stark dilemma: how to balance short-term growth while pursuing long-term impact? It’s an especially relevant question in a competitive landscape where
